Legal Opinion
Doreen Randall v. Yakima Nation Tribal Court, And, Davis Washines, Chief of Police for the Yakima Nation, Sub. Nom.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1988No. 87-3642PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Doreen Randall, a member of the Yakima Indian Nation, appeals from the order of the district court dismissing her petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to section 203 of the Indian Civil Rights Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1301-1303 (1982). We must decide whether the Yakima Nation Court of Appeals violated the Indian Civil Rights Act when it dismissed Randall’s appeal solely because the tribal trial court failed to rule timely on her in forma pau-peris motion.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Randall was employed as a field representative for the Yakima Nation’s maternal health…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Burns v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Karen Dexter v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Bird v. Glacier Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Ross Allen DohertyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Means v. Navajo NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Synowski v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.