Legal Opinion
Daniel Warmenhoven v. Netapp, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 13, 2021No. 19-16960PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL WARMENHOVEN, No. 19-16960 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 5:17-cv-02990- BLF NETAPP, INC.; NETAPP EXECUTIVE MEDICAL RETIREMENT PLAN, Defendants-Appellees. OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 10, 2021 San Francisco, California Filed September 13, 2021 Before: Morgan Christen and Bridget S. Bade, Circuit Judges, and Gary Feinerman, * District Judge. Opinion by Judge Feinerman * The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Alejandro Rodriguez v. James HayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Scott v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mohamed Sabra v. Maricopa County Community CollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Robert Bugielski v. At&t Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Dean Williams v. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Benefits and Investment Committee, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- ERIC DODGE V. EVERGREEN SCHOOL DISTRICT 114Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Gates v. E.M. Hundley Hardware Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.