Legal Opinion

Pac. Heating & Ventilating Co. v. Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co. of Brooklyn

California Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1910No. S.F. No. 5337PublishedCited by 40 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COUBT.

This appeal was first considered by the district court of appeal for the first district, which affirmed the order appealed from. Thereafter, on motion of the appellant, the- cause was transferred to this court for hearing and determination.

The opinion filed by the district court of appeal was prepared by Cooper, P. J. It reads as follows:—

“This action was brought to recover upon a fire insurance policy issued by defendant. Plaintiff had judgment, and the court denied a motion for a new trial, and this appeal is from the order.
“The policy was an agreement by defendant, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co. v. DorganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  2. Nielsen v. Provident Savings Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Williamsburgh City Fire Ins. Co. of Brooklyn v. WillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
  4. Baker & Hamilton v. Williamsburgh City Fire Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1907

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Walters v. American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API