Legal Opinion

Weinberg v. Bess

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1999No. 45S03-9503-CV-307PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

SELBY, J,

Sheryl Bess, Appellee/Petitioner and Plaintiff below, seeks review of the Court of Appeals’ grant of summary judgment in favor of Howard Weinberg, M.D., Appellant and Defendant below. Dr. Weinberg argued that the two year statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims barred Bess’s suit. The trial court denied Dr. Weinberg’s motion for summary judgment finding that a genuine issue of material fact remained as to whether the statute of limitations was tolled by fraudulent concealment. In Weinberg v. Bess, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Culbertson v. MernitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Harris v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hughes v. GlaeseIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Adams v. LurosIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bader v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Herron v. AnigboIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Spar v. ChaIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Hamilton v. AshtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Planned Parenthood of Indiana, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of HealthDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API