Fretz v. Roth
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing upon bill, answer, replication and proofs, in open court.
1Opinion of the Court
Garrison, V. C.
This is a bill filed by Heinrich Eretz against Carl Roth and wife.
The primary purpose of the bill is to secure an injunction against Carl Roth -enjoining him from proceeding with an action of ejectment brought by him against the complainant; its ultimate object is to have it decreed that the lands in question belong to the complainant.
There is also a sum of money, approximating $3,600, received by Carl Roth from the executor of the will of Louisa Eretz, which is claimed by the complainant.
*517The lands which were the subject of the ejectment suit are situate in Paterson, New…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Edgerly v. EdgerlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Adlard v. AdlardIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Burns v. BangertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
- Rider v. HulseNew York Supreme Court · 1860
- Warlick v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ridky v. RidkyMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Frick v. ConeNew York Supreme Court · 1936
- Meyer v. MeyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
- In re the Accounting of EkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- Madden v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.