Legal Opinion
In re the Accounting of Ekins
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Charles B. Wheeler,
Official Referee. The following are the essential facts as shown by the evidence given before the referee. Mr. and Mrs. Ekins were married in 1896. At the time of his marriage Mr. Ekins was in the employ of the New York Central Railroad Company as a freight conductor receiving a comparatively small monthly wage. His earnings at that time could have been little more than sufficient to meet the monthly household expenses. Since his marriage he has remained in the employ of the Central railroad, and been advanced in his position from time to time until he is now conductor on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hughes v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Neufville v. ThomsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Fretz v. RothNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- Countryman v. CountrymanNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rasmussen v. Oshkosh Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Frick v. ConeNew York Supreme Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of FliegelmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
- In re the Estate of BraunNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- In re the Probate of the Will of MoranNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943