Legal Opinion

Ridky v. Ridky

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1924No. Docket No. 29PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

The two above-entitled chancery suits were by consent of counsel' consolidated and heard together. The parties to them are husband and wife, elderly people above 60 years of age, who were married in 1886 and lived together until about the time this litigation arose. The bill filed by Charles J. Ridky, on July 1, 1919, is to reform a deed given to his wife, Theresa B. Ridky, of their home in Detroit, now valued at about $16,000, which he claimed it was agreed should be put in the name of both to hold by entireties as husband and wife.

The bill filed by her is for a divorce from him on the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fisher v. FobesMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Nester v. GrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Fretz v. RothNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
  4. Beck v. BeckNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Jackson Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Miller v. BelvilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  3. Beattie v. BowerMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Putnam v. PutnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Renegar v. BruningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API