In re the Claim of Franco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*829Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 10, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant, an accounting supervisor at a home health care agency, was terminated from his employment for violating the employer’s attendance policy prohibiting employees from having three or more sick leave absences within a three-month period. In his application for unemployment insurance benefits, claimant represented that he was laid off due to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of KearnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of PorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007