Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 28, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 27, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Initially, we note that dissatisfaction with one’s work assignment does not constitute good cause for leaving employment (see Matter of Cherry [Commissioner of Labor], 18 AD3d 937, 938 [2005]; Matter of Leonetti [Commissioner of Labor], 10 AD3d 837, 837 [2004]). Since the record reveals that claimant failed to report for work after being reassigned to a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Claim of AdorisioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re Claim of DeCarloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of ParisiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of GiustinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of ZaichikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of KrisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of SkinnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006