Legal Opinion
Peppi v. Phyllis Wheatley Community Center
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 25, 2000No. C6-00-251PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHUMAKER, Judge.
Relator complained to her supervisor that she was being sexually harassed in the workplace by a co-worker. The supervisor informed her that management would leave it up to her as to whether or not the complaint should be investigated. Relator then quit her job and the commissioner of economic security determined that she was ineligible for reemployment compensation benefits because she quit without good reason caused by her employer. Relator contends on certiorari review that her employer’s failure to investigate her complaint was good reason that caused her to quit her…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Gillson v. State Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Biegner v. Bloomington Chrysler/Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by8 opinions
- Munro Holding, LLC v. CookCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Johnson v. Walch & Walch, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Barbara Jackson, Relator v. Direct Home Health Care, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Janella Scott, Relator v. The Phoenix Residence, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Michael Robin, Relator v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.