Johnson v. Walch & Walch, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Relator challenges the decision by the commissioner’s representative that she is not entitled to unemployment benefits. Because there was substantial evidence to support the representative’s decision and because relator’s claim that she would suffer a substantial loss of income was speculative, we affirm.
FACTS
Relator Judy Johnson worked as a hair stylist for respondent Walch & Walch, Inc. (Walch) at its shop in Apache Plaza. She had worked in the same location since 1966. Although she was paid entirely on a commission basis and set her own hours, she was considered an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. UhlendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Tuff v. Knitcraft Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Peppi v. Phyllis Wheatley Community CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rowan v. Dream It, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Werner v. MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Eva B. Johnson, Relator v. Viking Magazine Service, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017