Legal Opinion
Gillson v. State Department of Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 24, 1992No. C1-92-434, C0-92-442PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
In this sexual harassment action, the trial court granted judgment in favor of respondent Carla J. Gillson against appel*837lants Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, State of Minnesota and Daniel Casey. The state and the DNR dispute liability and challenge a mental anguish award, a civil penalty against the DNR, and an attorney fees award. Casey appeals entry of judgment against him individually and dismissal of his defamation counterclaim. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
PACTS
In 1977, Gillson started working for the DNR forestry division in Hill City.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Wirig v. Kinney Shoe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kohn v. City of Minneapolis Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Navarre v. South Washington County SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Peppi v. Phyllis Wheatley Community CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Munro Holding, LLC v. CookCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Kunza v. St. Mary's Regional Health CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.