Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Antoun v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 17, 1939PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This is a petition under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 258, to enforce against the Commonwealth a claim for the alleged breach of a contract. The judge ordered judgment for the respondent, and reported the case. Since the matter was presented upon a case stated, the requests for rulings reported are of no consequence, and will not be considered. Howland v. Stowe, 290 Mass. 142, 146.

After a purported taking of the petitioner’s land by the county of Worcester, which was invalid for failure to state the interest taken (G. L. c. 79, § 1; Walker v. Medford, 272 Mass. 161; Malinoski v. D. S. McGrath, Inc.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howland v. StoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Malinoski v. D. S. McGrath, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Ferris v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Radovsky v. WexlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Inhabitants of Watertown v. DanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Associates Discount Corp. v. GillineauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  2. Nichols v. Commissioner of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Redden v. RamseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Coleman Bros. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Lewis v. Conrad & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API