Legal Opinion
Lewis v. Conrad & Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 27, 1942PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
The plaintiff’s intestate brought this action to recover for an alleged breach of warranty of the defendant *542arising out of the sale of a dress. The plaintiff, as administrator, was admitted as a party. The case was referred to an auditor, whose findings of fact were to be final. The defendant filed two objections to his report, only one of which needs to be considered. That objection is to the finding of the auditor that there was a breach of an implied warranty on the part of the defendant in the sale of the dress to the plaintiff’s intestate, and to the finding for the plaintiff and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. English Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Merrimac Chemical Co. v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Howland v. StoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Rosenblum v. GinisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Brooks v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- New England Gas & Electric Ass'n v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Union Old Lowell National Bank v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Carrig v. Gilbert-Varker Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- W. W. Britton Inc. v. S. M. Hill Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Members of Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union of America v. Hall Baking Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.