Legal Opinion

Skaff v. Sioux City

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 10, 1969No. 53161PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNELL, Justice.

Plaintiffs in a law action claimed damages from defendant city alleging unreasonable delay in the prosecution of eminent domain proceedings to acquire plaintiffs’ business property and for interference with their use of the property while the proceedings were pending.

The city denied the material allegations of the petition. Affirmative defenses originally pleaded are not argued on appeal.

The trial court found the city as con-demnor had not in good faith diligently instituted and prosecuted the eminent domain proceedings, and that the delay was unreasonable giving rise to this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Iowa State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. Henneman v. McCallaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Marean v. PetersenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. Nalon v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Graham v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Twin-State Engineering & Chemical Co. v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Osborn v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. Nadler v. City of Mason CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  4. Hawkeye Land Co. v. ITC Midwest LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2015
  5. Grisor, S. A. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API