Quilter v. Voinovich
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
Before this court is the Motion of Plaintiffs for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.
I
This case is on remand from the United States Supreme Court, which, in Voinovich v. *38Quitter, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1149, 122 L.Ed.2d 500 (1993), resolved three issues concerning the defendants’ plan that reapportioned Ohio’s state legislative districts pursuant to 1990 census data. First, the Court held that the plan does not violate the protection against race-based vote dilution in § 2 of the Voting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Quilter v. VoinovichDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
- Quilter v. VoinovichDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- Quilter v. VoinovichDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
- Quilter v. VoinovichDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
- Quilter v. VoinovichDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995