Legal Opinion

In Re Beasley

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided April 24, 2003No. 03-02-00530-CRPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MACK KIDD, Justice.

Jerry Dwight Beasley appeals from an order denying his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. See Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 64.05 (West Supp.2003). We will affirm the order.

Beasley is serving a forty-year prison sentence imposed after he was convicted of aggravated sexual assault. 1 On January 14, 2002, he filed a pro se motion for forensic DNA testing of evidence obtained during the investigation of the offense. See id. art. 64.01(a), (b). On February 20, 2002, the district court appointed counsel to represent Beasley in this proceeding although there is no…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Rey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Ex Parte GravesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Winters v. Presiding Judge of the Criminal District Court Number Three of Tarrant CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Hooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  3. Hughes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  4. Ard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  5. Ard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API