Legal Opinion
Ard v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided March 22, 2006No. 10-04-00034-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILL VANCE, Justice.
Doyle Sherman Ard appeals the denial of his motion for forensic DNA testing. In one issue, he asserts that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in his appointed counsel’s representation on his Chapter 64 motion.
Background
Ard was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and was sentenced to forty years in prison. We affirmed the conviction in an unpublished opinion. See Ard v. State, No. 10-00-00283-CR (Tex. App.-Waco Oct. 30, 2002, pet. ref'd, untimely filed) (not designated for publication). In this case, the victim testified that he and Ard…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In the Interest of M.S.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Kutzner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Dunbar v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hooks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- State v. PoeNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- In re BabsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- Ard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.