Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Graves

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 2, 2002No. 73,927PublishedCited by 176 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.

in which KELLER, P.J., MEYERS, WOMACK, KEASLER, and HERVEY, J.J., joined.

In his third post-conviction death penalty writ, applicant asks us to consider the following issue: does an allegation in a subsequent writ application that prior ha-beas corpus counsel was not “competent” under article 11.071, section 2(a) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure:1 1) give rise to a cognizable habeas corpus *105claim; and 2) fulfill the requirements under article 11.071, section 5 for having this Court consider the merits of a subsequent writ? Because we find that competency of prior habeas counsel is…

3Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Ex Parte YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by176 opinions

  1. Elizalde v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Ex Parte TuleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Winters v. Presiding Judge of the Criminal District Court Number Three of Tarrant CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Ex Parte BlueCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. State v. HillCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016

171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API