Legal Opinion

In re Wasserman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 2, 1956No. 14762PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order entered by Chief Judge Leon R. Yankwich denying the motion of one Bertram S. Harris that Ben Wasserman be admitted to practice generally in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.

The motion sets up that Bertram S. Harris is a member of the bar of that court in good standing; that Ben Wasserman is a member of the bar in good standing of the following named courts: State of Arkansas, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas and United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. In Re SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. David J. Gallo, Movant-Appellant v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Real Party in Interest-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Matter of the Application of Ben Wasserman, for Admission to the Bar of the United States District Court, Southern District of California. Ben WassermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  3. In Re Judith BerkanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  4. In Re CorrinetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Giannini v. RealDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API