Legal Opinion
Giannini v. Real
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 20, 1989No. C-88-6279 SAWPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEIGEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action challenging his denial to practice law in the State of California, and in the United States District Courts for the Central, Southern and Eastern Districts of California. Defendants are the California Supreme Court, the named justices of that court, the said District Courts, the named judges of those courts, the Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar and its committee members. 1
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment for admission to practice in the named federal district courts and for a preliminary injunction ordering…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Linda Marie Zambrano, and Jose E. Tafolla, Esq. Philip W. Orr, Esq., Claimants-Appellants v. City of Tustin David KreylingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Joseph R. Giannini v. Manuel L. Real A. Wallace TashimaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- A. Wallace Tashima, United States District Judge v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts L. Ralph Mecham, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Tashima v. Administrative Office of the United States CourtsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1989
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. BerchDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.