Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Portland Railroad

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 6, 1905PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On exceptions and motion by defendant. Action on the case for negligence to recover for personal injuries to the plaintiff while a passenger on one of the cars of the defendant, a street railway corporation. Tried at the October term, 1904, Supreme Judicial Court, Cumberland County.

Read the full summary

On exceptions and motion by defendant. Action on the case for negligence to recover for personal injuries to the plaintiff while a passenger on one of the cars of the defendant, a street railway corporation. Tried at the October term, 1904, Supreme Judicial Court, Cumberland County. Verdict for plaintiff for $969. Defendant excepted to a certain instruction given by the presiding Justice at the request of the plaintiff’s counsel, and also filed a general motion for a new trial. Exceptions sustained. Motion not considered. The case appears in the opinion. Memorandum. This case was argued at…

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

This is an action on the case for negligence to recover for personal injuries to the plaintiff while a passenger on one of the cars of the defendant, a street railway corporation. The case comes up on motion and exceptions. It was alleged in the plaintiff’s declaration and evidence was introduced by the plaintiff tending to show that the defendant’s car had been brought to a full stop near the tracks of a steam railroad, that the ear was started again while the plaintiff was in the act of alighting therefrom, and before she had liad sufficient and reasonable time to alight, whereby she was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. . the New York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Reed v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. McPheeters v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  4. Village of Culbertson v. HollidayNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Rouse v. DownsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hecht Co., Inc. v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Archuleta v. JacobsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WadeTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ArnottIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Wiley v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API