Legal Opinion

Ostendorf-Morris Co. v. Slyman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1982No. 44026PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, J.

Plaintiff-broker appeals from a judgment for defendants-sellers on broker’s claim for a commission on the sale of commercial real estate. Broker asserts that the trial court’s verdict and judgment were against the manifest weight of the evidence. 1 We find that the trial court’s decision is supported by competent, credible evidence, so we affirm.

The evidence in this non-jury trial shows that the sale property was owned by Mr. and Mrs. Slyman and Mr. Carrino. Mr. Fox, a salesman for plaintiff-broker, first contacted Mr. Slyman to inquire about leasing some real property unrelated to this case.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  4. Kohn v. CohnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Lancaster County Farmers National Bank AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Legros v. TarrOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. ShueOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Barbeck v. Twinsburg TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Harben v. HuttonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  5. State v. TruittOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API