Ostendorf-Morris Co. v. Slyman
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, J.
Plaintiff-broker appeals from a judgment for defendants-sellers on broker’s claim for a commission on the sale of commercial real estate. Broker asserts that the trial court’s verdict and judgment were against the manifest weight of the evidence. 1 We find that the trial court’s decision is supported by competent, credible evidence, so we affirm.
The evidence in this non-jury trial shows that the sale property was owned by Mr. and Mrs. Slyman and Mr. Carrino. Mr. Fox, a salesman for plaintiff-broker, first contacted Mr. Slyman to inquire about leasing some real property unrelated to this case.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Walsh v. TurlickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Kohn v. CohnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lancaster County Farmers National Bank AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Legros v. TarrOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. ShueOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Barbeck v. Twinsburg TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Harben v. HuttonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- State v. TruittOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.