Legal Opinion
Dailey v. Benn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 10, 1921No. 9646PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error from District Oourt, Seminole County; C. Cuy Cutlip, Special Judge. Action in ejectment by Margaret R. Benn against Louisa Daily and others; J. D. Ly-dick and others intervening. Judgment for plaintiff and J. D. Lydick and others, and defendant Daily and others bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtPitchford, J.
This is an appeal from the district court of Seminole county, Oklahoma ; the subject-matter being the title to 40 acres of land in said county, being the allotment of one William Bowlegs, a Seminole freedman.
The brief filed by plaintiffs in error contains the following stipulations:
“To avoid making this case-made unnecessarily long and tedious by incorporating in the same the evidence produced on the trial of the same in the district court and the rulings thereon by 'the court, we, the undersigned attorneys in said case, agree that no substantial good is to be accomplished by so incorporating…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McDougal v. McKaySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Beauchamp v. BertigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Thorn v. ConeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Dobberstein v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Eakins v. EakinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harjo v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Gray v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Gray v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Lincoln v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Ned v. CountissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.