Legal Opinion

Ned v. Countiss

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 1921No. 11410PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Jefferson County ; Cham Jones, Judge. Action by Willie Ned and others against H. D. Countiss and D. A. Cathey to recover land. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This suit was instituted in the district court of Jefferson county, by the plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs below, against the defendants in error, defendants below, for the recovery of an undivided one-half of certain lands situate in Jefferson county, and being the allotment of Linnie Reed, deceased, who was a duly enrolled member of the' Choctaw Tribe of Indians, enrolled as a Mississippi Choctaw. The plaintiffs allege in the third paragraph of their petition:

“* * * they acquired title to said land by inheritance, in the following manner, to wit: Said Linnie Reed died in 190-1,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kelly's Heirs v. McGuireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
  2. De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Shulthis v. McDougalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. McDougal v. McKaySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Godfrey v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Homer v. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Minshall v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. First Nat. Bank of Decatur, Neb. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Gray v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Gray v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API