Legal Opinion

Warner v. Wickizer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 16, 1930No. 19910PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEACH, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county, on March 7, 1914, by E. S. Warner against Margaret O. Wickizer et al., to obtain possession of 160 acres of land and to recover rents thereon.

It was alleged by plaintiff that he was the fee' owner of the land, and that the defendants denied his rights therein and unlawfully withhold possession thereof under claim of absolute ownership.

The land involved was the allotment of Tecumseh Tiger, a full-blood Greek Indian, who died during the year 1900, patent to the land being subsequently issued to his heirs.

This is the third…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Flesher v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Stolfa v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Beaver v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. International Land Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Hurie v. QuiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Abboud v. Abboud (In Re Abboud)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Peppers Refining Company v. SpiveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Wirick v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Secrest v. SecrestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Abboud v. AbboudCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API