Legal Opinion

International Land Co. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 1924No. 13224PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, C.

The plaintiffs in error were the plaintiffs below, and the defendant in error was the defendant. The parties will be designated herein as plaintiffs and ■ defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

The plaintiffs, by their petition, sought to iecover possession of an undivided two-thirds interest in and to all of the west half of the southwest quarter (W. y2 of S.W. %), and the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter (S.E.% of S.E.14) of section five (5), township twelve north (12 N.) range eleven (11) east I. B. M., in Okfuskee county, Okla., and rents and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boyce v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  2. Martin v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Powers v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Fuller v. SwensbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hendricks v. MusgroveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ludey v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Beaver v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Hurie v. QuiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Moore v. HarjoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  5. Wirick v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API