Legal Opinion

State v. Crouser

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1996No. 18580PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOON, Chief Justice.

Following a bench trial, defendant-appellant Delbert L. Crouser was convicted of abuse of a family and household member, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 709-906 (1993). 1 On appeal, Crouser con tends that: (1) the court’s finding that his conduct was not justified under HRS § 703-309 (1993) 2 is clearly erroneous; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction; and (3) the trial court committed plain error by failing to dismiss the case because HRS § 703-309 is unconstitutionally vague and/or overbroad. For the reasons discussed below, we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GaylordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. FurutaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. TrippHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. KameenuiHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. EnglandOregon Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. StockerHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. KalamaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Doe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. KikutaHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. MatavaleHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API