State v. Crouser
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MOON, Chief Justice.
Following a bench trial, defendant-appellant Delbert L. Crouser was convicted of abuse of a family and household member, in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 709-906 (1993). 1 On appeal, Crouser con tends that: (1) the court’s finding that his conduct was not justified under HRS § 703-309 (1993) 2 is clearly erroneous; (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction; and (3) the trial court committed plain error by failing to dismiss the case because HRS § 703-309 is unconstitutionally vague and/or overbroad. For the reasons discussed below, we…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GaylordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. FurutaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. TrippHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. KameenuiHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. EnglandOregon Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. StockerHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. KalamaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Doe v. DoeHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KikutaHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. MatavaleHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.