Legal Opinion

State v. Kameenui

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1988No. 12347, 12353PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LUM, C.J.

The Defendants, Bryan Kameenui and David Kealoha, were convicted in unrelated incidents under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 709-906, the spouse abuse statute. These appeals challenge the statute as unconstitutionally void for vagueness and over-breadth for failure to adequately define the term “physical abuse.” We hold that the statute is not vague or overbroad and affirm the convictions.

I

State v. Kameenui. On the evening of February 23, 1987 Bryan Kameenui was home with his three children while his wife, Sherry, was out drinking with friends. When Sherry…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. State v. KaneakuaHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. BlossHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. City of Cincinnati v. McIntoshOhio Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. GaylordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. EastmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. Sun Na LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. TrippHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. CrouserHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API