State v. Kameenui
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LUM, C.J.
The Defendants, Bryan Kameenui and David Kealoha, were convicted in unrelated incidents under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 709-906, the spouse abuse statute. These appeals challenge the statute as unconstitutionally void for vagueness and over-breadth for failure to adequately define the term “physical abuse.” We hold that the statute is not vague or overbroad and affirm the convictions.
I
State v. Kameenui. On the evening of February 23, 1987 Bryan Kameenui was home with his three children while his wife, Sherry, was out drinking with friends. When Sherry…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- State v. KaneakuaHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. BlossHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Cincinnati v. McIntoshOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. GaylordHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. EastmanHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. Sun Na LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. TrippHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CrouserHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.