Legal Opinion

State v. Gerlach

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 13, 2013No. 200901597; A144947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

In this criminal case, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of 10 crimes, including two counts of first-degree kidnapping, ORS 163.235, arguing that the trial court erred in holding that the antimerger statute, ORS 161.067(3), prevented the two kidnapping counts from merging.1 We review for errors of law, State v. McConville, 243 Or App 275, 277, 259 P3d 947 (2011), and conclude that that statute did not prevent the two counts from merging, and, therefore, defendant could properly be convicted of only one count of kidnapping. Accordingly, we reverse the two first-degree kidnapping…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. WolleatOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. Valladares-JuarezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. BarnumOregon Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. NunesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. OpitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. KinslowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API