State v. Reed
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
In this criminal case, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of one count of unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135, four counts of felony fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer, ORS 811.540, and one count of reckless driving, ORS 811.140. Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s entry of separate convictions on the four counts of attempting to elude a police officer, arguing, as he did before the trial court, that those counts should have merged because the antimerger statute, ORS 161.067, does not apply. We conclude that ORS 161.067(3) does apply because…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. West-HowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. RappCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. BallangrudCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.