Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Roark

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1926No. Civil No. 2505PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— James A. Harrison, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit in the superior court of Santa Cruz county against Blaine W. Roark and Margaret 0. Roark, his wife, hereinafter called defendants, to collect a balance due on a promissory note executed by defendants, and to foreclose a realty mortgage given by them to secure the payment of the note. They answered, admitting the execution of the note and mortgage, but setting up in substance as a defense that plaintiff, with intent to cheat, defraud and injure the defendants, had made a material alteration in the note without their authorization;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spallholz v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. WatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Knox v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Walton Plow Co. v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Hocknell v. SheleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morrison v. ActonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Brazee v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Durham v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. of CaliforniaArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Sun City Water Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Tom Reed Gold Mines Co. v. United Eastern Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API