Legal Opinion

Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. Watson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1905PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Harrison County. Action of assxmvpsit by Philip Carey Manufacturing Company against Andrew J. Watson. Verdict for defendant and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Cox, Judge:

'In an action of assumpsit by the Philip Carey Manufacturing Company against Andrew J. Watson, in the circuit court of Harrison county, there was a trial by jury and motion by defendant to exclude plaintiff’s evidence and to direct a verdict for défendant, which was sustained and a verdict accordingly and judgment of dismissal thereon; and plaintiff brings error.

The first question raised is: Did the office judgment in this action become final on the last day of the next term of court after it was entered at rules, it not being previously set aside and there being no plea to issue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marstiller v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Piercy's Heirs v. PiercyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Yeager v. MusgraveWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Belcher v. GastonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. Peoples BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Star Piano Co. v. BurgnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Waldren v. WallerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. LotonoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Harrison v. RoarkArizona Supreme Court · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API