Legal Opinion

Durham v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. of California

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1936No. Civil No. 3535PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Firestone Tire & Bubber Company of California, a corporation, hereinafter called the California company, and Firestone Service Stores, Inc., of Phoenix, an Arizona corporation, hereinafter called the Phoenix company, against M.. H. Durham, defendant, rendered upon certain directed verdicts. From the order overruling the motion for new trial and the judgment, this appeal is taken.

The suit was brought by the California company, and the pleadings are very lengthy. We therefore summarize only so much of them as is necessary to explain the issues on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reilly v. ClyneArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  2. MacDonald v. Reich & Lievre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Schwab v. E. G. Potter Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Denny Hotel Co. v. SchramWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Moore v. Los Lugos Gold MinesWashington Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Adroit Supply Co. v. Electric Mutual Liability InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Figueroa v. MajorsArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Valley National Bank v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Cano v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. City of Phoenix v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API