Krieger v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The local administrative committee of The State Bar in Los Angeles recommended that the petitioner be disciplined for violations of sections 6067, 6068, 6103 and 6106 of the Business and Professions Code by suspension from practice for a period of 90 days. The Board of Governors adopted the findings of the committee but has recommended suspension for two years, taking into consideration a public reproval by the board in 1950, the nature of petitioner’s conduct, and the severity of the loss sustained by his client through his misconduct.
Petitioner is 56 years old. He was admitted to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Stanford v. the State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Wallis v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Shaeffer v. State Bar of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Roark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Hawk v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Magee v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Hunniecutt v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.