Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Palmer v. . Haywood County

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1937PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClarkson, J.

Action for injunction against issuance of county bonds to build annex to county hospital.

Bonds are proposed to be issued under the following resolution: "Be it ordered by the board of county commissioners of the county of Haywood as follows: (1) For the purpose of constructing an addition to the county hospital, which shall be used principally for the care of indigent sick and afflicted poor of the county, bonds of the county shall be issued to the aggregate amount of $30,000. (2) A tax sufficient to pay the principal and interest of the bonds when due shall be annually levied and collected.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fawcett v. Town of Mt. AirySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Henderson v. . WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Armstrong v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Storm v. Town of Wrightsville BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Burleson v. . Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sides v. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Williamson v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Insurance Co. v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Sing v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API