Legal Opinion

Burleson v. . Board of Aldermen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1930PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

The findings of fact on which the judgment in this action was rendered were made by the judge from admissions in the pleadings, and from the official minutes of the town of Spruce Pine. There were no exceptions to these findings. The only exception on which plaintiffs assign error on their appeal to this Court, was to the judgment. Their contention upon this assignment of error is that the bonds which the defendants propose to issue and to sell were not a binding and legal obligation of the town of Spruce Pine, for the reasons: (1) that said bonds are not for a necessary expense within the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Armstrong v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Henderson v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Airport Authority v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Madison Cablevision, Inc. v. City of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Maready v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Brumley v. . BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API