Williamson v. City of High Point
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.
The right of plaintiffs, as taxpayers in the city of High Point, to maintain this action to test the authority of the city to issue the proposed bonds and to acquire and construct the proposed electric system, is too well recognized in this State to admit of debate. Therefore, if the plaintiffs be correct in their contentions, they are entitled' to injunction. Hence, we deem it unnecessary to consider the further claim of the intervening plaintiff, as a public electric utility entity, owning a lawful business, valuable franchises, and property rights, to the additional right to maintain the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fawcett v. Town of Mt. AirySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Rhyne v. . LipscombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Brockenbrough v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Holmes v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Asbury v. Town of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Elliott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Britt v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.