Legal Opinion
Cozad v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 15, 1957No. Civ. 22265PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Appellant, a licensed chiropractor, appeals from an adverse judgment in his action seeking a declaration that section 651 of the Business and Professions Code and section 311 of the California Administrative Code are unconstitutional and void and an injunction permanently restraining respondents from enforcing the provisions of those sections against appellant because of certain of his advertisements.
Defendant Board of Chiropractic Examiners is a Division of the Department of Professional and Vocational Standards of the State of California (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 100-101 (r)) and is the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Perez v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wotton v. BushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- California Employment Commission v. Butte County Rice Growers Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Borror v. Department of InvestmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- In Re FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Mission Pak Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Sultan Turkish Bath, Inc. v. BOARD OF POLICE COMRS. OF CITY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Duskin v. State Board of Dry CleanersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.