Legal Opinion

Mission Pak Co. v. State Board of Equalization

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1972No. Docket Nos. 37971, 37706PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEPHENS, J.

For a number of years prior to August 12, 1963, Mission Pak, Inc., was in the business of processing and manufacturing certain fruit products, the retail selling of processed fruit products, and the retail selling of fresh fruits. During this time Mission Pak, Inc., paid certain sales and. use taxes which were assessed against it as a consequence of a law which required such taxes to be paid on “candy or confectionery” (Rev. (& Tax. Code, § 6359) and State Board of Equalization Ruling 52 (tit. 18, Cal. Admin. Code, § 2002) 1 which determined that “candy or confectionery . .…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Pitts v. PerlussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Ralphs Grocery Co. v. ReimelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Culligan Water Conditioning of Bellflower, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Credit Insurance General Agents Ass'n v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. In Re FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Wallace Berrie & Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Cook v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API