Legal Opinion
Swerdloff v. AEG Design/Build, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 15, 1988No. 13357PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
The plaintiffs, Mark and Ileen Swerdloff, appeal from the trial court’s order reducing but not discharging a mechanic’s lien placed on their real property by the defendant, AEG Design/Build, Inc. The plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in refusing to consider their claim, first articulated during final argument, that the mechanic’s lien was invalid because the underlying home improvement agreement was not *186in writing as required by the Home Improvement Act, General Statutes § 20-429.1 We find no error.
The facts relevant to this appeal are as follows. On June 2,1987, the defendant filed…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Rybinski v. State Employees' Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Roche v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Red Rooster Construction Co. v. River Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Sgueglia v. Milne Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Haynes Construction Co. v. Cascella & Son Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.