Legal Opinion

Arout v. Azar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 14, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff was not entitled to treble damages under section 535 of the Real Property Law (as added by Laws of 1920, chap. 930), as directed by the court after the verdict of $500., That section applies where a person is disseized, ejected or put out of real property in a forcible manner. Plaintiff was neither disseized, ejected nor put out of her possession. The *261defendants were guilty of a trespass. Furthermore, the section, which re-enacted section 1669 of the Code of Civil Procedure, only applies where the force is unusual, tends to bring about a breach of the peace, and the entry is with a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hallock v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Drinkhouse v. Parka Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. United States Ex Rel. Horelick v. Criminal Court of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. Poppen v. WadleighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Billig v. Nelson Properties, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1938
  5. Jennings v. High Farms Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API