Legal Opinion

Hallock v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action was brought to recover the treble damages allowed by section 1669 of the Code of Civil Procedure in cases of the forcible entry upon, or detainer of, real property. Upon the trial, the case was submitted to the jury upon the evidence and the plaintiff obtained a verdict; the amount of which was trebled by the judgment pursuant to the statute. There was an affirmance at the Appellate Division, by a divided court, and the defendant now appeals to this court.

I think that the case should not have been submitted to the jury and that the motion for a nonsuit, made upon the plaintiff's…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fults v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Wood v. . PhillipsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. People ex rel. Kline v. RickertNew York Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arout v. AzarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. Poppen v. WadleighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API