Legal Opinion

Jennings v. High Farms Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittohi, J.

Motion by plaintiffs for a temporary injunction in an action for damages resulting from the allegedly forcible interference with plaintiffs’ right of peaceable possession of a strip of land about 50 feet wide and 1,100 feet long, and extending in a southerly direction from the intersection of High Farms Road and the Crossway in the Town of Oyster Bay.

An action for damages for interference with peaceable possession is an action at law (Fults v. Munro, 202 N. Y. 34, 40), The instant complaint contains no action for equitable relief, nor do the plaintiffs seek a judgment for a permanent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fults v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Babho Realty Co. v. FefferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Arout v. AzarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Riessen v. KayeNew York Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erdman v. IngrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  2. Weed v. Niles Homes, Inc.Nassau County District Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API