Legal Opinion

Poppen v. Wadleigh

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 11, 1952No. 35,600, 35,624PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Justice.

This is an action for damages sustained by plaintiff as the result of his eviction from 65 acres of farm land leased from defendant. Defendant counterclaimed for the value of certain crops allegedly appropriated by plaintiff and for other damages. At the trial, the jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Both parties appeal. Defendant appeals from the order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for judgment for treble damages.

Plaintiff is the owner of a farm in Douglas…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fults v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Hoy v. GronobleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
  3. Behrendt v. RassmussenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Pappas v. StarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Cross v. RamdullahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dopheide v. SchoeppnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. Berg v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. St. Jude Medical, S.C. v. Biosense Webster, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  4. Nelson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Les Jones Roofing, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API