Legal Opinion

People v. Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 2002PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.), dated April 6, 2000, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The hearing court properly relied upon its recollection of the plea proceeding, the presentence report, and the case summary of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (hereinafter the Board), rather than upon the defendant’s statements to the contrary, in finding that the prosecution proved by clear and convincing evidence…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. People v. StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Doe v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. People v. DoratoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. HinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. People v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. People v. NoriegaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. BrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API