People v. Penson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated January 28, 2005, which, after a hearing to redetermine the defendant’s sex offender risk level pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]), designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant is correct that the Supreme Court failed to set *867forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which its determination was based, as required by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. DaoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. McGrawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. VillaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. GuitardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. BanksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. McKeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.