Spriggs v. United States
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
WISS, Judge:
This is a writ-appeal petition under Rule 4(b)(2), United States Court of Military Appeals Rules of Practice and Procedure, 38 MJ LXXVII (July 1, 1983), to review the Court of Military Review’s denial of petitioner’s petition for extraordinary relief. See 28 USC § 1651(a). Spriggs complains that the convening authority improperly vacated the suspension of his sentence. See United States v. Bingham, 3 MJ 119, 120 n. 2 (CMA 1977) (vacation proceedings “are integral parts of a court-martial sentence which, as such, are reviewable by this Court”). Particularly, he…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. BinghamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. LibecapU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
- United States v. CockrellU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
- United States v. PilkingtonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
- United States v. DavisNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
- United States v. MitchellNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.