Legal Opinion

Spriggs v. United States

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 19, 1994No. 94-8057; CMR Misc. No. 93-13PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

WISS, Judge:

This is a writ-appeal petition under Rule 4(b)(2), United States Court of Military Appeals Rules of Practice and Procedure, 38 MJ LXXVII (July 1, 1983), to review the Court of Military Review’s denial of petitioner’s petition for extraordinary relief. See 28 USC § 1651(a). Spriggs complains that the convening authority improperly vacated the suspension of his sentence. See United States v. Bingham, 3 MJ 119, 120 n. 2 (CMA 1977) (vacation proceedings “are integral parts of a court-martial sentence which, as such, are reviewable by this Court”). Particularly, he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BinghamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. LibecapU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  2. United States v. CockrellU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  3. United States v. PilkingtonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
  4. United States v. DavisNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
  5. United States v. MitchellNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API