Legal Opinion
United States v. Libecap
U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals
Decided August 30, 2002No. CGCMS 24214; Docket No. 1154PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUCE, Judge:
In this case, we must decide if a novel provision in a pretrial agreement is unenforceable because it is prohibited by Rule 705(c)(1), Rules for Courts-Martial (RCM), Manual for Courts-Martial, (2000 Ed.) (MCM) or it violates public policy.
Appellant was tried by a special court-martial, military judge alone. He was convicted in accordance with his pleas, made pursuant to a pretrial agreement, of three specifications of assault consummated by a battery on his wife, and one specification of assault on a sentinel in the execution of his duty, all in violation of Article 128, Uniform…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- Ralph Henry Cooper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. CummingsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
- United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. BullaU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. SheehanUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. ThomasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
- United States v. HudsonU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. SunzeriNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.