Legal Opinion

In Re Reiner

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 1989No. 88-1159PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In response to an Order of this Court dated October 18, 1988, the Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) recommended that reciprocal discipline of ninety days suspension from the practice of law should be imposed on respondent pursuant to D.C.Bar R. XI § 18(5). Finding that Virginia’s imposition of a ninety-day suspension for three violations of the Disciplinary Rules does not constitute “substantially different discipline in this jurisdiction,” we order that reciprocal discipline be imposed.

I

The Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board (Virginia) suspended respondent from the practice of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
In Re RosenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
In Re BenjaminDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
In Re KrounerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
In Re ZelloeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
In the Matter of McCabeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.